Stashr vs ContextBolt
ContextBolt and Stashr both turn your social bookmarks into one searchable library with semantic search. ContextBolt leans into the AI workflow, shipping a personal MCP endpoint so Claude or Cursor can query your saves mid-conversation. Stashr captures every save in real time across four platforms, adds TikTok and Instagram, and keeps its own copy of the text and images so a post survives deletion.
Feature by feature
| Feature | Stashr | ContextBolt |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time auto-capture | ||
| Permanent copy, survives deletion | ||
| Platforms covered | ||
| Bulk-import your backlog | Yes | |
| AI auto-tagging | Yes | |
| Collections & filters | Yes | |
| Search by meaning | Yes | |
| One unified library | Yes | |
| Media gallery | Soon | No |
| Ask your library | Soon | |
| MCP connector | Soon | |
| Pricing | 14-day free trial, then $8 to $10/mo | Free 150 saves; Pro $6/mo unlimited |
Pricing
Stashr
Hobby $8/mo or Pro $10/mo, dropping to $6 and $7.50 billed yearly. Includes a 14-day free trial.
ContextBolt
Free tier capped at 150 saves; Pro $6/mo for unlimited saves, cloud sync, export, and the MCP endpoint.
Common questions
The verdict
If your whole workflow lives inside Claude, Cursor, or Windsurf and you want to query your X, Reddit, and LinkedIn saves over MCP today, ContextBolt is a sharp, focused tool at $6 a month. But it stops at three platforms and indexes your saves for search rather than archiving them. Stashr captures every bookmark the moment you tap save across X, Reddit, Instagram, and TikTok, keeps its own copy of the text and images so the post survives deletion, and ships semantic search too. If you save on TikTok or Instagram, or you want your library kept for good rather than just searchable, Stashr is the better home for it.
More comparisons
Try Stashr Pro
The full memory layer for everything you save online. Auto-captured, AI-tagged, and findable in plain English.
Starts with a 14-day free trial.
